tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38436816.post2176353936813886115..comments2024-01-21T14:29:38.613-08:00Comments on Dangerous Idea 2: Is the case for materialism as strong as it looks?Victor Repperthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10962948073162156902noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38436816.post-34424631776730760312018-07-29T20:51:51.984-07:002018-07-29T20:51:51.984-07:00www0730
uggs outlet
christian louboutin shoes
ugg ...www0730<br /><a href="http://www.uggoutletclearanceonline.us.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>uggs outlet</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.christian-louboutinshoes.me.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>christian louboutin shoes</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.uggoutletsstores.us.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>ugg boots</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.vibramfivefingersshoes.us.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>vibram fivefingers shoes</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.outletmoncler.us.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>moncler outlet</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.supremenewyork.us.org" rel="nofollow"><strong>supreme new york</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.ferragamoshoes.us.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>ferragamo shoes</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.ralphlaurenoutletuk.org.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>ralph lauren uk</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.superdryclothing.org.uk" rel="nofollow"><strong>super dry</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.truereligionjeanstr.us.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>true religion outlet</strong></a><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07126467365618669731noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38436816.post-22249570105375995442007-04-30T06:20:00.000-07:002007-04-30T06:20:00.000-07:00It seems that Feser is making at least two mistake...It seems that Feser is making at least two mistakes.<BR/><BR/>First, were we to study protons, neutrons and electrons, we would find that they are not flammable. Flammability is found in the interactions of vastly complex structures of these particles. So, how can it be that protons, neutrons and electrons, which cannot be flammable can explain why gasoline burns? <BR/><BR/>Well, it is quite obvious that flammability is built upon complex configurations of these building blocks, and flammability only makes sense in that context. You will never be able to assign an intrinsic property of a configuration of components to an individual component. So it is with mental properties. If mental properties are founded on complex configurations on a material substrate, you shouldn't expect to see mental properties in individual particles, or even individual subsystems like neurons.<BR/><BR/>Second, Feser is losing track of his definitions. Intentionality is defined by our experience of intent. It is not defined by its non-material nature. If physicalism is correct, then intentionality does not become an illusion. It is only the belief that intentionality is non-material that becomes an illusion. Intentionality remains as it has always been, and as important to us as it has always been.Doctor Logichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03182745193512661770noreply@blogger.com