A blog to discuss the argument from reason.
Labels: Feser, Searle
posted by Victor Reppert @ 9:05 PM
In my amateur opinion, Feser seems correct. Whenever I see Searle talking about his view of the science, it really sounds like he's playing with categories and definitions more than making a distinction from dualism.(Then again, emergentists and some non-reductive physicalists strike me as having something similar going on.)
michael kors outlet clearanceoakley sunglassescoach outletceline outletchristian louboutin outletjordan 11snike air max 90ray ban sunglasseslouis vuitton handbagscoach factory outlet onlinenike nfl jerseysray ban sunglassespolo ralph shirtscheap jordan shoeslouis vuitton handbagstoms shoeslouis vuitton handbagscoach factory outletralph lauren outletfitflop sandalslongchamp handbagskobe bryant shoesair jordanslouis vuitton outletchristian louboutin outletjordan 4coach outletlebron james shoes 13cheap nfl jerseystrue religion jeanstods outletmichael kors outletcoach factory outletcheap jordan shoestory burch salecheap oakley sunglassesreplica watchesjordan retroasics shoesmichael kors outlet20167.29chenjinyan
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
I am the author of C. S. Lewis's Dangerous Idea: In Defense of the Argument from Reason, published by Inter-Varsity Press. I received a Ph.D in philosophy from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1989.
View my complete profile
Subscribe toPosts [Atom]