A blog to discuss the argument from reason.
Labels: neutral monism
posted by Victor Reppert @ 11:53 AM
If I were to base my views about neutral monism on Stubenber's SEP entry, I'd be disappointed, too. I think Donald Davidson and Bertrand Russell do a much better job explaining this sort of view.Also, when it comes to panprotopschism, the charitable thing to do would be to read Chalmers' book, and do one's best at understanding and defending it as rigorously as you could. At least, that's what I would do before criticizing it. Here's the format I would take if I were to criticize Chalmers' view. First, I would read his book. Then, I would get clear on what his account is of panprotopsychism. Then, I would spend at least one post explaning it in a fair and sympathetic manner. Finally, I would point out where, exactly, I think it goes wrong -- or at least how, exactly, substance dualism is a *better* account of the nature of consciousness.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
I am the author of C. S. Lewis's Dangerous Idea: In Defense of the Argument from Reason, published by Inter-Varsity Press. I received a Ph.D in philosophy from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1989.
View my complete profile
Subscribe toPosts [Atom]